Since setting up the new HAM station here in the UK the one band I’ve not yet got back onto is 160m, one of my most favourite bands in the HF spectrum and one that I was addicted to when I live in France (F5VKM).
Having such a small garden here in the UK there is no way I can get any type of guyed vertical for 160m erected and so I needed to come up with some sort of compromise antenna for the band.
Only being interested in the FT4/8 and CW sections of the 160m band I calculated that I could get an inverted-L antenna up that would be reasonably close to resonant. It would require some additional inductance to get the electrical length required and some impedance matching to provide a 50 Ohm impedance to the transceiver.
Measuring the garden I found I could get a 28m horizontal section in place and a 10m vertical section using one of my 10m spiderpoles. This would give me a total of 38m of wire that would get me fairly close to the quarter wave length.
For impedance matching I decided to make a Pi-Network ATU. I’ve made these in the past and found them to be excellent at matching a very wide range of impedances to 50 Ohm.
M0AWS Homebrew Pi-Network ATU
Since I still had the components of the Pi-Network ATU that I built when I lived in France I decided to reuse them as it saved a lot of work. The inductor was made from some copper tubing I had left over after doing all the plumbing in the house in France and so it got repurposed and formed into a very large inductor. The 2 x capacitors I also built many years ago and fortunately I’d kept locked away as they are very expensive to purchase today and a lot of work to make.
Getting the Inverted-L antenna up was easy enough and I soon had it connected to the Pi-Network ATU. I ran a few radials out around the garden to give it something to tune against and wound a 1:1 choke balun at the end of the coax run to stop any common mode currents that may have appeared on the coax braid.
Connecting my JNCRadio VNA I found that the Inverted-L was naturally resonant at 2.53Mhz, not too far off the 1.84Mhz that I needed. Adding a little extra inductance and capacitance via the ATU I soon had the antenna resonant where I wanted it at the bottom of the 160m band.
M0AWS 160m Inverted L Antenna SWR Curve
With the SWR being <1.5:1 across the CW and FT8 section of the band I was ready to get on 160m for the first time in a long.
Since it’s still summer in the UK I wasn’t expecting to find the band in very good shape but, was pleasantly surprised. Switching the radio on before full sunset I was hearing stations all around Europe with ease. In no time at all I was working stations and getting good reports using just 22w of FT8. FT8 is such a good mode for testing new antennas.
As the sky got darker the distance achieved got greater and over time I was able to work into Russia with the longest distance recorded being 2445 Miles, R9LE in Tyumen Asiatic Russia.
In no time at all I’d worked 32 stations taking my total 160m QSOs from 16 to 48. I can’t wait for the long, dark winter nights to see how well this antenna really performs.
M0AWS Map showing stations worked on 160m using Inverted L Antenna
The map above shows the locations of the stations worked on the first evening using the 160m Inverted-L antenna. As the year moves on and we slowly progress into winter it will be fun to start chasing the DX again on the 160m band..
UPDATE 6th October 2023. Been using the antenna for some time now with over 100 contacts on 160m. Best 160m DX so far is RV0AR in Sosnovoborsk Asiatic Russia, 3453 Miles using just 22w. Pretty impressive for such a low antenna on Top Band.
This is a 15m band delta loop design that I’ve put together as requested by Wim, PE1PME.
The 15m band delta loop follows exactly the same design principles as all the other delta loop designs I’ve already put on the website. They are designed such that they present a 50 ohm impedance at the feed point and thus have no requirement for complex impedance matching circuits/transformers.
15m Band Delta Loop Antenna View
The dimensions for the antenna are as follows:
Wire 1 – Horizontal exactly 1m above the ground for its entire 7m length. Wires 2 & 3 are exactly 4.12m long each with the top being 3.18m above the ground.
15m Band Delta Loop Antenna 3D Far Field Plot
The 3D far field plot shows a typical delta loop radiation pattern with the maximum radiation through the loop and a deep null in the centre.
15m Band Delta Loop Antenna 2D Far Field Plot
The 2D elevation plot shows that the antenna will give a maximum gain of 1.5dBi at 26 degrees with useful gain at lower angles.
The SWR plot shows that the antenna will have a fairly wide bandwidth and match to 50 ohm coax extremely well. The antenna is designed to be fed in one of the lower corners via a 1:1 balun for best results.
15m Band Delta Loop Antenna SWR Curve
Summary:
Total Wire Length: 15.24m Horizontal Wire Length: 7m @ 1m above ground Diagonal Wire Lengths: 4.12m Wire Dia: 2.5mm Height at Centre: 3.18m Feed Type: 1:1 Balun in bottom corner (Can use coax if necessary) Impedance: 50 Ohm SWR: <1.5:1 at resonance
Many years ago I had an MFJ-259B antenna analyser that I used for all my HF antenna projects. It was a simple device with a couple of knobs, an LCD display and a meter but, it provided a great insight into the resonance of an antenna.
MFJ-259B Antenna Analyser
Today things have progressed somewhat and we now live in a world of Vector Network Analysers that not only display SWR but, can display a whole host of other information too.
Being an avid antenna builder I’ve wanted to buy an antenna analyser for some time but, now that I’m into the world of QO-100 satellite operations using frequencies at the dizzy heights of 2.4GHz I needed something more modern.
If you search online there are a multitude of Vector Network Analysers (VNAs) available from around the £50.00 mark right up to £1500 or more. Many of the VNAs you see on the likes of Amazon and Ebay come out of China and reading the reviews they aren’t particularly reliable or accurate.
After much research I settled on the JNCRadio VNA 3G, it gets really good reviews and is very sensibly priced. Putting a call into Gary at Martin Lynch and Sons (MLANDS) we had a long chat about various VNAs, the pros and cons of each model and the pricing structure. It was tempting to spend much more on a far more capable device however, my sensible head kicked in and decided many of the additional features on the more expensive models would never get used and so I went back to my original choice.
Gary and I also had a long chat about building a QO-100 ground station, using NodeRed to control it and how to align the dish antenna. The guys at MLANDS will soon have a satellite ground station on air and I look forward to talking to them on the QO-100 transponder.
M0AWS – JNCRadio VNA 3G PackagingM0AWS – JNCRadio VNA 3G in box with connectors and cables
Initially I wanted to check the SWR of my QO-100 2.4GHz IceCone Helix antenna on my satellite ground station to ensure it was resonant at the right frequency. Hooking the VNA up to the antenna feed was simple enough using one of the cables provided with the unit and I set about configuring the start and stop stimulus frequencies (2.4GHz to 2.450GHz) for the sweep to plot the curve.
The resulting SWR curve showed that the antenna was indeed resonant at 2.4GHz with an SWR of 1.16:1. The only issue I had was that in the bright sunshine it was hard to see the display and impossible to get a photo. Setting the screen on the brightest setting didn’t improve things much either so this is something to keep in mind if you plan on using the device outside in sunny climates.
(My understanding is that the Rig Expert AA-3000 Zoom is much easier to see outside on a sunny day however, it will cost you almost £1200 for the privilege.)
A couple of days later I decided to check the SWR of my 20m band EFHW vertical antenna. I’ve known for some time that this antenna has a point of resonance below 14MHz but, the SWR was still low enough at the bottom of the 20m band to make it useable.
Hooking up the VNA I could see immediately that the point of resonance was at 13.650Mhz, well low of the 20m band and so I set about shortening the wire until the point of resonance moved up into the band.
JNCRadio VNA3G showing 20m Band EFHW Resonance
With a little folding back of wire I soon had the point of resonance nicely into the 20m band with a 1.35:1 SWR at 14.208Mhz. This provides a very useable SWR across the whole band but, I decided I’d prefer the point of resonance to be slightly lower as I tend to use the antenna mainly on the CW & FT4/8 part of the band with my Icom IC-705 QRP rig.
Popping out into the garden once more I lengthened the wire easily enough by reducing the fold back and brought the point of resonance down to 14.095Mhz.
JNCRadio VNA3G showing 20m Band EFHW Resonance 14Mhz to 14.35Mhz Sweep
The VNA automatically updated the display realtime to show the new point of resonance on the 4.3in colour screen. I also altered the granularity of the SWR reading on the Y axis to show a more detailed view of the curve and reduced the frequency range on the X axis so that it showed a 14Mhz to 14.35Mhz sweep. With an SWR of 1.34:1 at 14.095Mhz and a 50 Ohm impedance, the antenna is perfectly resonant where I want it.
It’s interesting to note that the antenna is actually useable between 13.5Mhz and 14.5Mhz with a reasonable SWR across the entire frequency spread. Setting 3 markers on the SWR curve I could see at a glance the SWR reading at 14Mhz (Marker 2) , 14.350Mhz (Marker 3) and the minimum SWR reading at 14.095Mhz (Marker 1).
The bi-directional slot fed HF antenna isn’t mentioned very often these days for some strange reason. It’s a real shame as it is an excellent antenna that gives high gain through the loop between the frequencies of 14Mhz and 29Mhz.
M0AWS 20m – 10m Slot Fed HF Antenna
Construction of the antenna is relatively simple, 3 x 3m long horizontal wires and 2 x 9.2m long vertical wires. I’ve modelled the antenna using 20mm diameter copper tubing for the horizontal conductors and 2.5mm wire for the two vertical conductors. Using the 20mm copper tubing provides a rigid platform for the mounting of the antenna on a non-conductive mast whilst reducing weight by using 2.5mm wire for the vertical conductors. You could of course use 20mm copper tubing for all the conductors if you have a non-conductive mast that can handle the weight.
An alternative option is to hang the antenna from a high tree and secure it in position with non-conductive nylon cord. This works very well and makes it extremely easy to manually rotate.
The antenna is fed at the centre of the middle horizontal tube (conductor 2 in the image above) using one of the following methods:
Method 1 – Use a 4:1 Balun and ATU either in the radio/Radio Shack or connected directly to the Balun. Connecting a remote auto ATU to the balun directly at the feed point is the best option as you will then have a perfect 50 Ohm impedance match to the coax cable going back to the radio. (I’ve used my AH-705 and a 4:1 Balun at the feed point in the past with excellent results).
Method 2 – Connect a remote auto ATU directly to the feed point of the antenna and then 50 Ohm coax back to the radio shack. This will provide a perfect SWR match on all bands and works extremely well. (I’ve used my AH-705 remote auto ATU in this configuration as well in the past, again with excellent results and no discernible difference to method 1).
Method 3 – Feed the antenna with 450 Ohm open ladder line and use a 4:1 Balun and ATU in the radio shack to match the antenna to 50 Ohm radios. It’s important to bring the 450 Ohm ladder line away from the feed point horizontally and not vertically downwards. This will then help to protect the radiation pattern.
Looking at the 2D Far Field Plots this antenna provides excellent gain at relatively low radiation angles on all bands 20m – 10m making it an ideal antenna for chasing DX.
20m Band 2D Far Field Plot 17m Band 2D Far Field Plot 15m Band 2D Far Field Plot 12m Band 2D Far Field Plot 10m Band 2D Far Field Plot
The gain on each band is as follows:
20m Band – 7.83dBi at 24 Degrees 17m Band – 9.07dBi at 20 Degrees 15m Band – 9.63dBi at 16 Degrees 12m Band – 10.36dBi at 14 Degrees 10m Band – 10.99dBi at 12 Degrees
10m Band 3D Far Field Plot
The 10m Band 3D Far Field Plot above shows the typical radiation pattern for the antenna. Maximum radiation is through the loop with very little high angle radiation making it ideal for chasing DX stations. Gain increases as frequency increases however, angle of maximum radiation decreases as frequency increases improving DX capability of the antenna on the higher bands. It’s worth ensuring that the antenna is rotatable as this will then enable you to point the antenna at the DX station to maximise signal strength at the DX end. Pointing this antenna North/South makes it great for working VK/ZL over the North Pole whilst at the same time being able to work South Africa from the UK.
Summary:
Horizontal Wire Lengths: 3m @ 20mm Diameter Vertical Wire Lengths: 9.2m @ 2.5mm Diameter Modelled Height above ground at Centre (Conductor 2): 10.6m Feed Type: 4:1 Balun + ATU / Remote Auto ATU / 450 Ohm Ladder line with 4:1 Balun & ATU
Following on from my 2m Band Eggbeater Satellite Antenna here’s the design for the 70cm Band version that will enable duplex satellite operation.
The design is basically the same as the 2m antenna but, with smaller dimensions. All modelling has been done with the antenna at 5m AGL.
70cm Band Eggbeater Satellite Antenna
Each of the Eggbeater loops has a conductor size of 5mm and a circumference of 73.5cm with the radials exactly 5cm below the bottom of the loops. The 8 radials are exactly 34.15cm long each. The distance between the bottom of the eggbeater loops and the radials must be 5cm to get the best radiation pattern from the antenna.
With these dimensions the antenna has an SWR of <1.5:1 across the whole 70cm band making it ideal for both satellite and general repeater/SSB working.
70cm Band Eggbeater Satellite Antenna 3D Far Field Plot
The 3D far field plot shows that the antenna has a good mix of high and low angle radiation that makes it ideal for working satellites at all elevation angles.
70cm Band Eggbeater Satellite Antenna 2D Far Field Plot
The 2D far field plot shows that the antenna has the following high gain lobes:
The null at the top of the antenna isn’t as pronounced as on the 2m model and so this antenna should perform better when the satellite is directly above. Just like on the 2m band version, this antenna must also have a feed phase angle of 90 degrees between the two eggbeater elements. It’s very important that the phasing harness is built accurately as it can impact the radiation pattern of the antenna if the phase angle isn’t correct.
ON6WG has written an excellent article on how to create the phasing harness using 2 pieces of coax cable, this is an ideal solution for this antenna.
I’ve been chatting a lot recently on Matrix about antennas for the amateur satellites.
Since I’m currently working on building a ground station for the QO-100 satellite a group of satellite enthusiasts having been talking about the other satellites that are in orbit around this little planet of ours.
The ISS FM voice repeater on 145.990Mhz is very popular and is one of the easiest satellite stations to get into apparently. Many are using Eggbeater antennas to get an all round radiation pattern.
I’ve never looked into building or modelling such antennas and so I decided to have a go at modelling one and use it as an opportunity to see how it works.
All the modelling has been done with the antenna at 5m above ground level.
2m Band Eggbeater satellite Antenna with 8 Radials
Each loop has a circumference of 2.17m and each of the 8 radials is 0.5425m long and 5cm below the eggbeater elements. I’ve modelled the antenna using 5mm diameter conductors as this should make them resistant to wind etc. I am planning on using 5mm copper tubing for the build.
2m Band Eggbeater Satellite Antenna 3D Far Field Plot
The 3D far field plot shows a typical radiation pattern for such an antenna with a very good low angle gain for working satellites on the horizon and multiple high gain lobes as the radiation angle increases. At 5 degrees the RF is horizontally polarised, ideal for shooting directly out at the horizon. This is mainly due to the phasing of the two elements. At the higher angles the RF is vertically polarised thus giving the ability to receive both horizontal, vertical and some circular radiation at a good range of angles. There is however, a very slight null directly above the antenna and so signals to satellites directly above will be attenuated slightly compared to the other two high angle high gain lobes. This will also be the case on receive.
2m Band Eggbeater Satellite Antenna 2D Far Field Elevation Plot
With 5.42dBi gain at 5 Deg this antenna has a real good shot at the horizon with the maximum gain of 6.65dBi being at the much higher angle of 65 Deg. Overall this antenna should work well for all satellites from the horizon up to almost directly above the antenna.
2m Band Eggbeater satellite Antenna SWR Curve
With an SWR of 1.5:1 across most of the 2m band this antenna will match perfectly to 50 Ohm coax feed. It’s really important to remember that when building this antenna the loops must be fed with a phase angle difference of exactly 90 degrees. If this isn’t accurate then the radiation pattern is affected quite drastically and spoils the overall performance of the antenna.
Details on how to create the 90 Degree phase shift between the two elements using 2 pieces of 50 Ohm coax can be found in the excellent article by ON6WG.
Over the years I’ve built many multi band vertical HF antennas including multi-element quarter wave verticals like the DXCommander configuration, multiple end fed vertical dipoles all on the same pole and a host of other configurations. As with all multi band antennas there’s always a compromise, on some bands it performs well and on others it doesn’t, it’s the nature of the beast.
For some time now I’ve been using a multi band vertical antenna that has over the last year performed incredibly well on all bands from 80m to 10m. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not perfect however, it has out performed every other multi band HF vertical I’ve tried to date even though it’s by far the simplest antenna design and according to the antenna modelling software I have it shouldn’t be as good as it is.
So what is this magical multi band HF vertical I speak of? Well it’s nothing more than a piece of wire 13.4m long taped up a 12.4m vertical Spiderpole with 1m of wire tucked down into the top of the Spiderpole.
Obviously this is not going to be resonant on any band without some sort of impedance matching circuit at the bottom of the wire. Originally this antenna was my end fed half wave vertical antenna for the 30m band that was fed via a 49:1 Unun. This antenna worked incredibly well on the 30m band allowing me to work DX globally with ease but, it was a single band antenna and I wanted a multi band solution.
I decided to remove the 49:1 Unun and replace it with a home brew LC circuit made up of a coil made from 5mm copper tubing and a large air spaced variable capacitor I had laying around from an old ATU project I built many moons ago.
This simple LC arrangement at the bottom of the wire worked incredibly well and tuned the wire from 80m to 10m with a perfect SWR on each band using nothing more than a ground rod and 4 x 12m radials. Performance was surprisingly good on all bands 80-10m giving me the ability to get some DX stations that I’ve never been able to hit before. The only drawback to this solution was the fact that I had to go out and manually tune the antenna every time I wanted to change band. Not so much of a problem in the summer but, in the winter in the pouring rain and howling wind it’s no fun at all. (I resolve this issue further down in the article!)
Multi Band Vertical HF Antenna using a 12.4m Heavy duty Spiderpole at the end of the garden
Performance on the HF bands is incredibly impressive with this antenna. Modelling it on EzNEC software it shouldn’t be that great on bands above 20m however, it seems to defy the modelling software as it performs amazingly well on 17m, 15m and 12m, better than any other vertical antenna I’ve made for those bands. How this can be I do not know, normally my antenna builds match closely what the modelling software shows but, in this instance it doesn’t and I’ve really no idea why.
Multi Band Vertical HF Antenna showing loop at top and wire tucked down into pole
Always wanting to put things into perspective here’s some details of the contacts I’ve made on each band showing how well this antenna has performed over the last year or so.
Firstly the 80m band, I’ve not used this band much over the winter months as I’ve got into the higher bands however, the map below shows all the stations worked on 80m using this antenna.
Stations worked on the 80m band from the M0AWS QTH
There are 51 contacts in total, not a big number by any means however, there are some good distances made with contacts into North America, South America and Indonesia. I’m sure I could had done better if I’d spent more time on this band, something to aim for next winter perhaps.
Next is the 60m band, a band I really like and have enjoyed over the winter months. The antenna performs incredibly well on this band even though we have very limited access to 60m here in the UK. With 288 contacts in the log with a good spread of distances I’m really pleased with how this antenna performs on this band.
Stations worked on the 60m band from the M0AWS QTH
Moving up in frequency the 40m band is the next one on the list, this is a great band and one that I’ve loved for many years. I’ve spent countless hours on CW on this band in the past and worked some great DX. The performance of this antenna on the 40m band is excellent, if I can hear the DX normally I can work them regardless of where in the world they are located. With 226 contacts in the log spread globally over the winter here in the northern hemisphere I have no complaints about performance of this antenna on the 40m band.
Stations worked on the 40m band from the M0AWS QTH
Moving up onto the 30m band I have to admit this is probably my favourite band of all. I’ve spent so many hours on CW working some of the best fists I have ever heard on the air I’ve grown to love this band not just for the DX available but, for the quality of operator found on this narrow piece of the RF spectrum. Needless to say since the antenna is a half wave on the 30m band performance is stunning, out performing any other 30m band antenna I have ever made. It’s even better than the 30m Delta Loop antenna that I built and used when I lived in France.
With 467 contacts in the log on the 30m band you can tell this is my goto band and one that offers access to some of the best DX in the world.
Stations worked on the 30m band from the M0AWS QTH
The 20m band is a band that I never really used until I moved back to the UK from France. Living in France I had acres of land and so I was very much into the low bands, 160m to 30m and never ventured above this part of the spectrum. Now living back in the U.K. with a typical U.K. sized garden the low bands are much more difficult to get onto and so my interests have moved up in frequency somewhat.
Getting onto the 20m band I was amazed at how easy it is to work DX stations compared to the low bands, it’s simply a case of if you can hear them you can work them, there’s no real challenge to be honest. Because of this the band is always super busy with people shouting over the top of each other to get the DX. Not to be put off, I’ve made a surprising 412 contacts on 20m covering the globe. This antenna works incredibly well on this band and you really don’t need anything else to work DX on 20m.
Stations worked on the 20m band from the M0AWS QTH
Next is the 17m band, one of the WARC bands that I’ve never really ventured onto until now. I have to admit I really like this band, when it’s open it’s normally open to the world all at the same time. With an almost undetectable background noise level you can hear the faintest of signal on this band. This is one of the bands that according to the EzNEC modelling software this antenna shouldn’t be any good on but, I have to say that it’s performance is beyond anything I ever imagined. I’ve worked my longest distance yet on this band and with this antenna, ZL4AS at 11776 miles, a distance I haven’t achieved yet on any other band. The 17m band really is a great band, I’d actually say it’s better than the 20m band even though there is considerably less spectrum available. With 220 contacts in the log it’s been a fun band to use.
Stations worked on the 17m band from the M0AWS QTH
Continuing the theme of the WARC bands, the 15m band is another one that I’ve only discovered in the last 12 months. It’s only now that I realise what I’ve missed out on due to my addiction to the low bands for so many years.
I’ve only made 76 contacts on the 15m band, not a lot at all really. This is mainly due to the fact that I get easily side tracked by the 17m and 30m bands most of the time and the radio VFO never gets as far as 21Mhz. Performance of the antenna is good on 15m, I would say not as good as on the 17m band but, it’s no slouch by any means.
As you can see on the map below, I may of only made 76 contacts on the 15m band but, they are spread right across the world proving that this antenna’s DX-ability on 21Mhz really is rather good.
Stations worked on the 15m band from the M0AWS QTH
Finally we arrive at the top of the WARC bands, the little 12m band. Once again this band is very much like the 17m band, super low background noise level, when it’s open you can work huge distances with very little power but, often there is quite deep QSB that can make getting that elusive DX a bit more challenging.
With only 66 contacts in the log once again I’ve not spent a huge amount of time on this band but, it hasn’t disappointed. With global coverage from this antenna on 12m once again I am astounded at how well it works. With software modelling saying it should be terrible on 24.9Mhz with nothing but super high angle radiation, it really shouldn’t be a good antenna for DXing on this upper WARC band but, it is and I have no idea as to why!
Stations worked on the 12m band from the M0AWS QTH
Finally we arrive at the 10m band, another band that I have never got into even though many refer to it as the magic band. This is the band that I’ve made the fewest contacts on, not because the antenna doesn’t work at the dizzy heights of 28Mhz but, because I hardly ever get the VFO dial past the lower bands due to the level of DX available. I really should make more effort to get the best out of the 10m band, especially now the summer is coming.
With a measly 19 contacts in the log I should be ashamed of myself for not doing more on this band as it is very often open and busy with traffic. Since I’ve not really used the antenna that much on the 10m band it’s hard to say how well it performs however, I have had contacts into North and South America and so it shows potential.
Stations worked on the 10m band from the M0AWS QTH
As you can see, the performance of this antenna is self evident from the log entries, it works superbly even though the modelling software says it shouldn’t above 14Mhz. This is now my main antenna here in the U.K. and I’ve only made one change to the initial setup and that is to add a CG3000 remote auto ATU to replace the home-brew LC tuning circuit.
CG3000 Remote Auto ATU housed in a plastic box
With the CG3000 auto ATU in place I no longer have to venture out into the cold, wet garden in the winter months to change band, it’s just a case of sending a continuous 10w signal into it and leaving it to tune in less than 2 seconds. The CG3000 is a Pi Network ATU so it handles both high and low impedance loads with ease. A Pi Network ATU is one of the best you can have, I’ve made my own in the past and had excellent results.
So in summary, 13.4m of wire vertically up a 12.4m pole with 4 x 12m radials, a ground rod and a CG3000 Auto ATU will give any HAM station the ability to work DX on all bands from 80m to 10m without ever having to leave the shack to tune it.
Since I got the CG3000 off of Ebay for a bargain £170 and the 12m heavy duty Spiderpole for under £100 the total cost of the antenna is considerably less than many commercial offerings available and yet performs as well if not better.
If you want to get this antenna onto the 160m band then you just need to add a small coil into the mix at the bottom of the wire to increase the inductance in circuit. The CG3000 will then happily tune the entire 160m band. It’s best to remove this coil though for all the other bands otherwise performance is reduced.
Please be aware that the performance of this antenna will not be anywhere near as good if you use the ATU in your radio at the end of a coax run. This is because the coax becomes part of the antenna and the radiation pattern is all but destroyed. You will be extremely disappointed if you use the antenna in this fashion. The ATU must be at the end of the wire and connected directly to ground and the radials to get the performance that I have experienced.
Finally, if you have an Icom IC-705 and AH-705 remote auto ATU you can use the AH-705 ATU in place of the CG3000, you will get the same results as I have with the CG3000.
I have used my AH-705/IC-705 combo quite a few times with this antenna with excellent results although, the big antenna can sometimes result in the receiver of the IC-705 getting overloaded especially on the lower bands. This is easily resolved by reducing the RF Gain on the radio.
“Why don’t you mount your 20m EFHW Vertical antenna higher up in the air? It’ll work much better the higher you get it”.
I have over the years tried raising and lowering my vertical antennas for DXing and found that keeping the base of the antenna and feed point low has advantages over a raised installation. I’ll try and explain this using some 3D and 2D far field plots from the EzNEC antenna modelling software that I use.
Below are the 3D and 2D far field plots as I have it setup at the moment. The 49:1 Unun is at ground level with the base of the antenna also at ground level.
20m EFHW vertical fed at ground level 3D Plot20m EFHW vertical fed at ground level 2D Plot
Forgetting about the dBi gain figures for the time being and just concentrating on the overall radiation pattern you can see that with the antenna fed at ground level it has a typical circular radiation pattern with a deep null in the centre and a very low angle of maximum radiation. This makes the antenna perfect for DXing and is backed up by the success I’ve had on the 20m band working Australia, Thailand, Indonesia, South America, West Coast USA and Canada. This is exactly what I wanted and I’m extremely happy with it’s performance. I must add that I’m not looking to work European stations with this antenna, I’m only looking for DX stations especially those with very weak signals.
So now let’s take a look at what happens to the radiation pattern when we raise the antenna and the feed point above ground level.
First let’s raise the antenna so that the base and feed point are 3m above ground level.
20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 3m above ground 3D Far Field Plot20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 3m above ground 2D Far Field Plot
Looking at the two far field plots above you can see that with the antenna and feed point raised by 3m we start to get some high angle lobes appearing in the centre of the radiation pattern. The overall maximum radiation is still at a low angle and so this would still be good for DXing but, does have an element of high angle radiation to it now. This will of course mean we’ll start to be able to work stations much closer to us and also be able to hear them better.
Raising the base of the antenna and feed point to 5m above the ground we see that the high angle lobes get even bigger and start to distort the overall radiation pattern of the antenna.
20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 5m above ground 3D Far Field Plot20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 5m above ground 2D Far Field Plot
At 5m above ground the two high angle lobes have increased considerably which will result in more high angle radiation from the antenna. Maximum radiation is still at a low level though and so DXing will still be good with this setup but, from experimentation and experience I know that there are times when closer stations start to affect the ability to pick out the weaker DX stations. This is exactly what I don’t want.
Raising the antenna up even further to 10m above ground we get the following result.
20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 10m above ground 3D Far Field Plot20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 10m above ground 2D Far Field Plot
At 10m above the ground the two high angle lobes shown on the 2D elevation far field plot are now almost as big as the main lobe below it. This means there will be considerable high angle radiation from the antenna which will result in the ability to communicate with stations much closer to your QTH rather than focusing just on the DX stations.
If you’re looking for the best of both worlds then getting your antenna up higher is the way to go, you’ll be able to work stations in the 300-1500 miles range with ease and the DX stations thousands of miles away.
From my experience there is one disadvantage with this in that the closer stations tend to drown out the weaker DX stations reducing the overall DX capability of the antenna and this is why I keep the antenna feed point at ground level. From experimentation and experience gained over the years I’ve found that keeping the antenna base and feed point at ground level gives me a better chance at working the DX than I have if I raise the antenna up higher.
As with everything in life there’s always a compromise!
So it really does depend what you want to use your antenna for. If like me you only want to chase those rare DX stations that are always difficult to get then keep the base of the antenna and feed point low. This will maximise the null in the centre of the radiation pattern and keep interference from “local” stations to a minimum. The draw back to this of course is that you won’t be able to work the closer stations when there is no DX around.
However, if you want the ability to work more “local” stations and the stronger DX stations raise your antenna and feed point up to a more suitable level above ground so that you obtain more high angle radiation from your vertical antenna. Then when there’s no DX around you’ll still be able to chat with the more local stations.
I hope this helps all the people that read my blog understand the choice I have made and why I keep the base of the antenna and feed point at ground level.
My 49:1 Unun arrived from UK Antennas today, lost no time getting it into the garden and connected to the 20m EFHW Vertical antenna.
49:1 Unun from UK Antennas
I’m really pleased with the 49:1 Unun, really nicely put together and packaged professionally, great to get such a nice British made product!
Connecting the Unun up to the antenna I found that it added a little extra inductance I hadn’t planned for and so I needed to shorten the vertical wire a little to compensate.
Tuning the 20m EFHW Vertical
It took 3 snips of wire to get the antenna resonant in the 20m band again, with an SWR of 1.3:1 and the sun starting to set I decided that was fine for now and I’ll fine tune it tomorrow in the daylight. (See end of article for update)
Heading into the shack the 20m band was buzzing, lots of big signals and DX. I switched on to the 10m band and checked the SWR there, 1:1 across most of the band, perfect!
I then went on to check the 15m band, now I wasn’t expecting a match as it shouldn’t resonate there but, I found a 2:1 SWR across the band, weird!
So back on 20m, I plugged in the MacBook Pro and started WSJT-X in FT8 mode to see what was around.
20m EFHW Vertical at the end of the garden
First contact was into Canada, VE2FVV with a -10 report both ways and 2962 miles, not bad for 20w.
I then worked a flurry of stations from the USA but, the one I was really pleased with was PP1WW in Brazil. 5610 Miles using just 20w, this EFHW vertical really does has a lovely low angle of radiation.
PP1WW was the last station worked as it was dark by this time and the band closed. It was interesting to watch the PSKReporter site to see where I was being heard.
Stations that heard M0AWs on 20m
As you can see from the PSKReporter screenshot above, I was heard pretty much all over the world. I saw a number of VK stations in Australia pop up on FT8 but, never managed to get an answer back from any of them even though they reported hearing me on the PSKReporter site.
I was also pleased with the number of stations that I heard, once again good global coverage.
Stations heard by M0AWS on 20m
Band conditions are generally poor at the moment and we’re in a bad part of the 11 year sunspot cycle. Hopefully in the coming years propagation will improve and we’ll be able to work the world on just a couple of milliwatts!
I also tuned up onto the 10m band and heard quite a few FT8 stations on there, I was surprised as I wasn’t expecting the band to be open.
So tomorrow, I need to fine tune the antenna for the 20m band and get the SWR down to 1:1, hopefully this won’t affect the 10m band tuning too much.
Once the 12m Spiderpoles are back in stock I’ll get one ordered and build the 40m EFHW Inverted L that I’ve designed, I’m hoping it will open up the 40m/20/15/10m bands for some DXing over the summer months.
UPDATE: I ended up snipping off a total of 34.5cm of wire to get the SWR 1:1 at 14.100Mhz. This makes the entire 20m band useable with the SWR less than 1.5:1 at each end of the band. 2nd contact after trimming the wire was VK2LAW at 10454 Miles using just 25w of power.
Information as to why it’s best to keep the feed point at ground level for this antenna is here.
Ever since I got my Class A HAM Radio licence I’ve always been fascinated by the low bands.
160m, 80m and 40m have been my favourite go to bands for chasing DX for many years and I’ve really enjoyed overcoming the challenges that come with such low frequency radio operations. Working DX on 160m I learnt a lot, having a good receiver and a quiet antenna are far more important than having a lot of power. The QRM/QRN on top band often masks the weak DX signals and so designing and building antennas that have a relatively low angle of radiation but, are super quiet on receive is a skill that all top band DXers should embrace.
It’s particularly hard to work DX on 160m in the summer months however, all those DX signals are still there, they’re just masked by the static crashes that plague top band throughout the warmer months.
Discovering the grey line was a real eye opener too. Getting up early in the morning to catch that magic moment that starts just before the sun rises to about an hour afterwards, with DX signals pouring in from VK/ZL before the D layer gets established again. Discovering that on the grey line signals from afar often arrive from a very high angle and can be heard much better on a large horizontal loop near the ground than a large vertical.
As you can tell, I’m passionate about the low bands but, now I’m back in the U.K. and have a U.K. sized garden again those days of large full wave antennas on the low bands are gone and so I must look to pastures new.
To this end I’m going to get onto the higher frequency bands, 20m and upwards. I must admit that I’ve hardly used these bands as I’ve always been so focused on the lower bands.
Currently I have delta loop for 30m up in the garden, this is a great band for us CW and digital guys, it’s a band I really enjoy and so will continue to use it whilst discovering the higher bands.
So I thought I’d start with the 20m band, it’s a band that I’ve heard is really easy to work DX on. Being much quieter than the low bands I’ll give the delta loop antennas a rest and venture into the land of vertical antennas again.
Doing some antenna modelling on EzNEC the End Fed Half Wave (EFHW) antenna has a great radiation pattern with a nice low angle of radiation and even some gain compared to a dipole.
Construction will be easy as the antenna is so small compared to the low band antennas I’ve built in the past.
20m Band EFHW Vertical Antenna
An EFHW antenna is a relatively simple affair and for 20m it’ll be somewhere around 10.25m tall depending on where on the band I resonate it.
The difficult thing about half wave or any multiple of half wave antenna is that they present a very high impedance at the feed point. Unlike a half wave dipole that is made up of two quarter wave legs that present an almost perfect match to 50 Ohm coax cable (or a 1:1 balun), the EFHW will have a much higher impedance, normally in the range of 2000 Ohms or more. Having such a high impedance also means high voltages at the ends, something to be very aware of especially if you have children or pets in the garden!
Matching to this type of antenna can be done two ways, a simple LC circuit for high impedance feed points or via a 49:1 Unun.
Since I’ve built 1:1 baluns in the past for my delta loop antennas I’ve decided to go the way of the 49:1 Unun.
Simple LC Circuit for High Z matching and a commercially manufactured LDG 49:1 Unun
Looking online for parts to build a 49:1 Unun I stumbled across UK Antennas, they seem to have a wide selection of pre-built EFHW solutions and some very nice looking 49:1 Ununs capable of handling 400w, much more than I will ever throw at it. Contacting Ian the owner of the company via Ebay I found he has a 49:1 Unun in stock that he can ship to me next day so I decided to go ahead and order one rather than source the parts and build it myself.
UK Antennas 49:1 Unun
With the Unun sorted, let’s take a look at the radiation pattern for an EFHW Vertical on the 20m band.
Since I’m looking to do mainly CW and digital modes I’ll be tuning it for the lower end of the band.
Modelling this on EzNEC I’m pleasantly surprised at the radiation pattern of such a simple vertical.
20m EFHW Vertical 3D Field Plot
To get a radiation pattern like this on the low bands requires a very large vertical, on 160m we’re talking 80m in height!
On 20m an EFHW is only around 10.25m long, very easy to put up in most U.K. sized gardens using nothing more than an extendable fibre glass pole. The 3D Field Plot shows the lovely deep null in the centre as you’d expect and a great low angle circular radiation pattern.
20m EFHW 2D Field Plot
The elevation 2D field plot really shows the beauty of this antenna.
5.62dBi at 10 Deg and 5.56dBi at 5 Deg, perfect for the long haul DX chaser. The wide deep null in the centre will help attenuate the signals arriving at high angles from the EU that plague us on the East Coast of the UK.
So, it’s time to go find some wire, get cutting and get a fibre glass extendable pole mounted in the garden ready for the arrival of the 49:1 Unun.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
