DX – Page 3 – M0AWS Amateur Radio

15 March 202215 March 2022

40m Band NVIS Antenna Experiment

Since setting up the new station at my U.K. QTH I’ve not had any Inter-G contacts. This has mainly been due to the fact that the antennas I’ve currently got in place are all designed for chasing DX and so have far too low a radiation angle to be able to talk to other U.K. stations.

One of the things I do like about radio is the local chatter on the low bands. In the summer months working Inter-G on the low bands is most enjoyable so, I decided to put up a simple Near Vertical Incident Skywave (NVIS) antenna ready for the summer.

Unlike my French QTH, here in Suffolk we only have a tiny garden and so it’s a challenge to get any length of wire up that is anywhere near long enough for the low bands.

A quick measuring of the garden I worked out I could get 30m of wire approximately 3-4m off the ground at best. I’m very aware of my anti-antenna neighbours and so it needs to be as stealthy as possible.

I decided to use some 1.5mm wire that I had in the workshop and utilise the high washing line poles that are already in place to get the wire along the max length of the garden.

With the wire in place and connected to the CG3000 auto remote tuner that I got off of Ebay for a song, ground post and radials connected I found that the antenna tunes up fine on all 3 low bands, perfect!

Tuning up on the 40m band I had an SWR 1:1 anywhere on the band. I could hear a number of strong U.K. stations and a few Dutch and German stations too. Since I’m on the East Coast of the U.K. The Netherlands and Germany aren’t that far away as the crow flies.

Setting the radio onto 40w SSB (First time on SSB in a very long time!) I put out a call. First station to come back was G8VVY, Robin in Malmesbury Wiltshire. Signals weren’t particularly strong and I gave him a 4/4 report and got a 5/5 in return.

Next station was PA3GLK, Dave in The Netherlands. Again signal reports were 5/5 and 5/6 but, perfectly readable.

Next up was G0SXC, Kevin in Lancashire. Signal reports were 5/9 both ways this time, very strong and fully quietening, the high angle radiation was doing its thing!

Last call was ON3PAT, Pat in Belgium. Very strong signals both ways, 5/9++ at a distance of 153 miles. NVIS propagation is working very well. I turned the output down to just 25w and Pat still gave me a 5/9 report.

Later in the day I decided to run some FT8 QSOs on 40m to see how far I could get reliably with no more than 25w. I was hoping that I may just be able to get 1000 miles as an absolute maximum but, be able to work stations at 100 Miles or less with ease.

Map showing NVIS FT8 contacts on the 40m band

As you can see on the map above, 1534 miles was the best achieved, RX3ASQ just east of Moscow. The thing that pleased me most was the number of U.K. stations I could hear with the closest being just 43 miles away. Most European stations were easily worked even with reduced levels of power (10w) and so I’m hoping that this simple end fed NVIS antenna will become my goto antenna for local chatter on the 40m band.

What was very interesting was what I could hear on the antenna, I didn’t expect to hear any DX stations at all however, I was surprised to see stations from Mongolia, Japan and the USA popping up in the WSJT-X window.

Obviously I couldn’t get back to them as my angle of radiation was far too high to get a signal out over those distances but, it just goes to show what can be a heard on a very low long wire.

Map showing stations heard on 40m using NVIS antenna

By the end of the evening to my surprise I had been heard in the USA, I was amazed to see where I’d managed to get into with such a low antenna. The main cluster of stations were in the U.K. and Europe of course which is exactly what I wanted from this antenna.

Stations that heard M0AWS on 40m FT8 using NVIS antenna

So the next test will be on the 80m band, I’m hoping to get similar results on SSB with inter-G stations being easy to work. I doubt I will be able to get anywhere near the 1500 miles I achieved on the 40m band but, I’ll be more than happy with U.K. and EU stations.

More soon …

5 March 202210 March 2022

Will raising my vertical antenna make it work better?

A question I get asked regularly is:

“Why don’t you mount your 20m EFHW Vertical antenna higher up in the air?
It’ll work much better the higher you get it”.

I have over the years tried raising and lowering my vertical antennas for DXing and found that keeping the base of the antenna and feed point low has advantages over a raised installation. I’ll try and explain this using some 3D and 2D far field plots from the EzNEC antenna modelling software that I use.

Below are the 3D and 2D far field plots as I have it setup at the moment. The 49:1 Unun is at ground level with the base of the antenna also at ground level.

20m EFHW vertical fed at ground level 3D Plot

20m EFHW vertical fed at ground level 2D Plot

Forgetting about the dBi gain figures for the time being and just concentrating on the overall radiation pattern you can see that with the antenna fed at ground level it has a typical circular radiation pattern with a deep null in the centre and a very low angle of maximum radiation. This makes the antenna perfect for DXing and is backed up by the success I’ve had on the 20m band working Australia, Thailand, Indonesia, South America, West Coast USA and Canada. This is exactly what I wanted and I’m extremely happy with it’s performance. I must add that I’m not looking to work European stations with this antenna, I’m only looking for DX stations especially those with very weak signals.

So now let’s take a look at what happens to the radiation pattern when we raise the antenna and the feed point above ground level.

First let’s raise the antenna so that the base and feed point are 3m above ground level.

20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 3m above ground 3D Far Field Plot

20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 3m above ground 2D Far Field Plot

Looking at the two far field plots above you can see that with the antenna and feed point raised by 3m we start to get some high angle lobes appearing in the centre of the radiation pattern. The overall maximum radiation is still at a low angle and so this would still be good for DXing but, does have an element of high angle radiation to it now. This will of course mean we’ll start to be able to work stations much closer to us and also be able to hear them better.

Raising the base of the antenna and feed point to 5m above the ground we see that the high angle lobes get even bigger and start to distort the overall radiation pattern of the antenna.

20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 5m above ground 3D Far Field Plot

20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 5m above ground 2D Far Field Plot

At 5m above ground the two high angle lobes have increased considerably which will result in more high angle radiation from the antenna. Maximum radiation is still at a low level though and so DXing will still be good with this setup but, from experimentation and experience I know that there are times when closer stations start to affect the ability to pick out the weaker DX stations. This is exactly what I don’t want.

Raising the antenna up even further to 10m above ground we get the following result.

20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 10m above ground 3D Far Field Plot

20m EFHW Vertical with base and feed point 10m above ground 2D Far Field Plot

At 10m above the ground the two high angle lobes shown on the 2D elevation far field plot are now almost as big as the main lobe below it. This means there will be considerable high angle radiation from the antenna which will result in the ability to communicate with stations much closer to your QTH rather than focusing just on the DX stations.

If you’re looking for the best of both worlds then getting your antenna up higher is the way to go, you’ll be able to work stations in the 300-1500 miles range with ease and the DX stations thousands of miles away.

From my experience there is one disadvantage with this in that the closer stations tend to drown out the weaker DX stations reducing the overall DX capability of the antenna and this is why I keep the antenna feed point at ground level. From experimentation and experience gained over the years I’ve found that keeping the antenna base and feed point at ground level gives me a better chance at working the DX than I have if I raise the antenna up higher.

As with everything in life there’s always a compromise!

So it really does depend what you want to use your antenna for. If like me you only want to chase those rare DX stations that are always difficult to get then keep the base of the antenna and feed point low. This will maximise the null in the centre of the radiation pattern and keep interference from “local” stations to a minimum. The draw back to this of course is that you won’t be able to work the closer stations when there is no DX around.

However, if you want the ability to work more “local” stations and the stronger DX stations raise your antenna and feed point up to a more suitable level above ground so that you obtain more high angle radiation from your vertical antenna. Then when there’s no DX around you’ll still be able to chat with the more local stations.

I hope this helps all the people that read my blog understand the choice I have made and why I keep the base of the antenna and feed point at ground level.

More soon …

5 February 202212 March 2022

Simple EFHW vertical on 20m works great!

I completed the fine tuning of the 20m EFHW Vertical today, I got the SWR down to 1:1 at 14.10 Mhz. This gives me a perfect match for the CW and digital section of the band with the SSB part of the band not exceeding 1.4:1 at 14.350.

I ended up removing 34.5cm of wire from the original antenna length to get the resonance where I wanted it. This was caused mainly by the extra inductance added into the circuit by the 49:1 Unun. This is to be expected and perfectly normal when feeding an antenna via an impedance matching transformer.

I bolted the 49:1 Unun directly to the earth rod, this way it’s got a solid earth connected directly to it to keep the resistance to a minimum. (The metal mounting plate is also the earth termination point).

I spent some time today chasing the DX on the 20m band using the FT8 digital mode.

The fun started with VK2LAW in Sydney Australia, followed by E25ETT in Thailand, KP4CAR in Puerto Rico, 9G5AR in Accra Ghana and The Sahrawi Amateur Radio Club station S01WS in Western Sahara. A nice mix of stations dotted around the world.

PSKReporter map showing all the stations that I heard on 20m today

I like to keep an eye on the PSKReporter site whilst on air to see what I’m hearing. As you can see I heard stations from the West Coast USA right across to New South Wales in Australia and down south as far as Brazil. The 20m EFHW Vertical antenna and Yaesu FTDX10 radio combination really does have good ears

As for being heard, well it’s a similar story, below is a map showing all the stations that heard me as reported on the PSKReporter website.

One again, great global coverage from the antenna and transceiver combo with only 20w being used for most contacts. (25w used to break some of the pileups!)

Overall I’m really pleased with the performance of the antenna, for such a simple design it works exceedingly well. One huge advantage of a half wave over a quarter wave antenna is that the point of max current is 50% along the antenna’s length, on the 20m band EFHW Vertical this puts it some 5m above the ground lowering the angle of take off and making it a great DX antenna.

If you’ve not got a lot of space but, want to work the DX on 20m then I highly recommend you give one a try, I’m sure you’ll be amazed at how well it performs.

Can’t wait to get a 40m EFHW Inverted L up next!

Information as to why it’s best to keep the feed point at ground level for this antenna is here.

More soon …

4 February 202212 March 2022

20m EFHW Vertical + 49:1 Unun = DX

My 49:1 Unun arrived from UK Antennas today, lost no time getting it into the garden and connected to the 20m EFHW Vertical antenna.

I’m really pleased with the 49:1 Unun, really nicely put together and packaged professionally, great to get such a nice British made product!

Connecting the Unun up to the antenna I found that it added a little extra inductance I hadn’t planned for and so I needed to shorten the vertical wire a little to compensate.

It took 3 snips of wire to get the antenna resonant in the 20m band again, with an SWR of 1.3:1 and the sun starting to set I decided that was fine for now and I’ll fine tune it tomorrow in the daylight. (See end of article for update)

Heading into the shack the 20m band was buzzing, lots of big signals and DX. I switched on to the 10m band and checked the SWR there, 1:1 across most of the band, perfect!

I then went on to check the 15m band, now I wasn’t expecting a match as it shouldn’t resonate there but, I found a 2:1 SWR across the band, weird!

So back on 20m, I plugged in the MacBook Pro and started WSJT-X in FT8 mode to see what was around.

20m EFHW Vertical at the end of the garden

First contact was into Canada, VE2FVV with a -10 report both ways and 2962 miles, not bad for 20w.

I then worked a flurry of stations from the USA but, the one I was really pleased with was PP1WW in Brazil. 5610 Miles using just 20w, this EFHW vertical really does has a lovely low angle of radiation.

PP1WW was the last station worked as it was dark by this time and the band closed. It was interesting to watch the PSKReporter site to see where I was being heard.

As you can see from the PSKReporter screenshot above, I was heard pretty much all over the world. I saw a number of VK stations in Australia pop up on FT8 but, never managed to get an answer back from any of them even though they reported hearing me on the PSKReporter site.

I was also pleased with the number of stations that I heard, once again good global coverage.

Band conditions are generally poor at the moment and we’re in a bad part of the 11 year sunspot cycle. Hopefully in the coming years propagation will improve and we’ll be able to work the world on just a couple of milliwatts!

I also tuned up onto the 10m band and heard quite a few FT8 stations on there, I was surprised as I wasn’t expecting the band to be open.

So tomorrow, I need to fine tune the antenna for the 20m band and get the SWR down to 1:1, hopefully this won’t affect the 10m band tuning too much.

Once the 12m Spiderpoles are back in stock I’ll get one ordered and build the 40m EFHW Inverted L that I’ve designed, I’m hoping it will open up the 40m/20/15/10m bands for some DXing over the summer months.

UPDATE: I ended up snipping off a total of 34.5cm of wire to get the SWR 1:1 at 14.100Mhz. This makes the entire 20m band useable with the SWR less than 1.5:1 at each end of the band. 2nd contact after trimming the wire was VK2LAW at 10454 Miles using just 25w of power.

Information as to why it’s best to keep the feed point at ground level for this antenna is here.

More soon …

1 February 20225 August 2022

Going up in Frequency!

Ever since I got my Class A HAM Radio licence I’ve always been fascinated by the low bands.

160m, 80m and 40m have been my favourite go to bands for chasing DX for many years and I’ve really enjoyed overcoming the challenges that come with such low frequency radio operations. Working DX on 160m I learnt a lot, having a good receiver and a quiet antenna are far more important than having a lot of power. The QRM/QRN on top band often masks the weak DX signals and so designing and building antennas that have a relatively low angle of radiation but, are super quiet on receive is a skill that all top band DXers should embrace.

It’s particularly hard to work DX on 160m in the summer months however, all those DX signals are still there, they’re just masked by the static crashes that plague top band throughout the warmer months.

Discovering the grey line was a real eye opener too. Getting up early in the morning to catch that magic moment that starts just before the sun rises to about an hour afterwards, with DX signals pouring in from VK/ZL before the D layer gets established again. Discovering that on the grey line signals from afar often arrive from a very high angle and can be heard much better on a large horizontal loop near the ground than a large vertical.

As you can tell, I’m passionate about the low bands but, now I’m back in the U.K. and have a U.K. sized garden again those days of large full wave antennas on the low bands are gone and so I must look to pastures new.

To this end I’m going to get onto the higher frequency bands, 20m and upwards. I must admit that I’ve hardly used these bands as I’ve always been so focused on the lower bands.

Currently I have delta loop for 30m up in the garden, this is a great band for us CW and digital guys, it’s a band I really enjoy and so will continue to use it whilst discovering the higher bands.

So I thought I’d start with the 20m band, it’s a band that I’ve heard is really easy to work DX on. Being much quieter than the low bands I’ll give the delta loop antennas a rest and venture into the land of vertical antennas again.

Doing some antenna modelling on EzNEC the End Fed Half Wave (EFHW) antenna has a great radiation pattern with a nice low angle of radiation and even some gain compared to a dipole.

Construction will be easy as the antenna is so small compared to the low band antennas I’ve built in the past.

An EFHW antenna is a relatively simple affair and for 20m it’ll be somewhere around 10.25m tall depending on where on the band I resonate it.

The difficult thing about half wave or any multiple of half wave antenna is that they present a very high impedance at the feed point. Unlike a half wave dipole that is made up of two quarter wave legs that present an almost perfect match to 50 Ohm coax cable (or a 1:1 balun), the EFHW will have a much higher impedance, normally in the range of 2000 Ohms or more. Having such a high impedance also means high voltages at the ends, something to be very aware of especially if you have children or pets in the garden!

Matching to this type of antenna can be done two ways, a simple LC circuit for high impedance feed points or via a 49:1 Unun.

Since I’ve built 1:1 baluns in the past for my delta loop antennas I’ve decided to go the way of the 49:1 Unun.

Simple LC Circuit for High Z matching and a commercially manufactured LDG 49:1 Unun

Looking online for parts to build a 49:1 Unun I stumbled across UK Antennas, they seem to have a wide selection of pre-built EFHW solutions and some very nice looking 49:1 Ununs capable of handling 400w, much more than I will ever throw at it. Contacting Ian the owner of the company via Ebay I found he has a 49:1 Unun in stock that he can ship to me next day so I decided to go ahead and order one rather than source the parts and build it myself.

With the Unun sorted, let’s take a look at the radiation pattern for an EFHW Vertical on the 20m band.

Since I’m looking to do mainly CW and digital modes I’ll be tuning it for the lower end of the band.

Modelling this on EzNEC I’m pleasantly surprised at the radiation pattern of such a simple vertical.

To get a radiation pattern like this on the low bands requires a very large vertical, on 160m we’re talking 80m in height!

On 20m an EFHW is only around 10.25m long, very easy to put up in most U.K. sized gardens using nothing more than an extendable fibre glass pole. The 3D Field Plot shows the lovely deep null in the centre as you’d expect and a great low angle circular radiation pattern.

The elevation 2D field plot really shows the beauty of this antenna.

5.62dBi at 10 Deg and 5.56dBi at 5 Deg, perfect for the long haul DX chaser. The wide deep null in the centre will help attenuate the signals arriving at high angles from the EU that plague us on the East Coast of the UK.

So, it’s time to go find some wire, get cutting and get a fibre glass extendable pole mounted in the garden ready for the arrival of the 49:1 Unun.

More soon ….

UPDATES:

More info on antenna performance here.

Going QRP with the 20m EFHW Vertical and IC-705

Keeping it simple but effective – 20m EFHW Vertical